Genus

Caulostrepsis Clarke, 1908

Taxon description

Gaaloul et al., 2023

Emended diagnosis.—Borings with one entrance or embedment structure, pouch-shaped, created by a U-shaped gallery. More complex structures can result from multiple lobes of similar structure. The individual limbs of the gallery can be clearly visible along their total length. They can be connected by the vane, or they can be fused in an oval or flattened pouch shape without the vane. The distal end has at least double the width of the apertural end. The cross section is variably flat oval, elliptical, constricted, or dumbbell-shaped. Symmetrical, radially organized grooves or deep pits can be developed near the aperture in some cases. The aperture may have a similar form to the proximal cross section, or it may be modified by the development of superficial branches, grooves, and/or holes (modified after Bromley and D’Alessandro 1983, with some modifications by Pokorný and Štofik 2017).

Remarks.—Information about the number of grooves branching from the aperture “(normally 2 to 4 in number)” is removed from the diagnosis of Bromley and D’Alessandro (1983: 286) because the new ichnospecies of Caulostrepsis described below has much more grooves. Caulostrepsis is a boring produced mostly by species of the spionid polychaete Polydora Bosc, 1802 (Boekschoten 1966), foremost P. ciliata (Johnston, 1838) (Radwański, 1969), and the eunicid polychaete Lysidice ninetta Audouin and Milne-Edwards, 1833 (Bromley 1978, 2004). Caulostrepsis ranges from the Devonian to the present (Clarke 1908; Bromley 2004). It occurs mainly in the infralittoral Plio-Pleistocene and the recent Mediterranean coasts (Bromley and D’Alessandro 1990), but mostly in the lower intertidal and subtidal zones, rarely deeper, and very rarely on the continental slope and the abyssal zone (Ekdale et al. 1984: 127).

Wisshak et al., 2019a

Macroboring; substrate calcareous; tracemaker invertebrate

Buatois et al., 2017

Category of architectural design: 2.61. U-shaped borings.

Knaust, 2012a

Unbranched, U-shaped

Pokorný & Štofik, 2017

Diagnosis: Borings with one entrance or embedment structure, pouch-shaped, created by a U-shaped gallery. More complex structures can result from multiple lobes of similar structure. The individual limbs of the gallery can be clearly visible along their total length, they can be connected by the vane, or they can be fused in an oval or flattened pouch shape without the vane. The distal end has at least double the width of the apertural end. The cross-section is variably flat-oval, elliptical, constricted, or dumbbell-shaped. Symmetrical, radially organized grooves or deep pits can be developed near the aperture n some cases (normally 2 to 4 in number). The aperture may have similar form to the proximal cross-section or it may be modified by the development of superficial branches, grooves, and/or holes (Bromley and d’Alessandro, 1983).

Aiheeseen liittyvät julkaisut
Knaust, D., Schnick, H. 2024. Trace fossils from the Maastrichtian chalk of the Isle of Rügen, north-east Germany. Geologie en Mijnbouw 103, DOI:10.1017/njg.2024.6
Gaaloul, N., Uchman, A., Ben Ali, S., Janiszewska, K., Stolarski, J., Kołodziej, B., Riahi, S. 2023. In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the Upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 68, 4, 659–681. DOI:10.4202/app.01095.2023
Martinell, J., Domènec, R. 2022. Bioerosió en molluscs pleistocens de la plataforma marina catalana [Bioerosion in Pleistocene mollusks from the Catalan marine platform]. Nemus 12, 237-261.
Blissett, D. J., Pickerill, R. K. 2007. Systematic ichnology of microborings from the Cenozoic White Limestone Group, Jamaica, West Indies. Scripta Geologica 134, 77-108.
Botquelen, A., Mayoral, E. 2005. Early Devonian bioerosion in the Rade de Brest, Armorican massif, France. Palaeontology 48, 5, 1057-1064. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2005.00492.x
Försterra, G., Beuck, L., Häussermann, V., Freiwald, A. 2005. Shallow-water Desmophyllum dianthus (Scleractinia) from Chile: characteristics of the biocoenoses, the bioeroding community, heterotrophic interactions and (paleo)-bathymetric implications. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems, pp. 937-977. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI:10.1007/3-540-27673-4_48
Pickerill, R. K., Donovan, S. K., Portell, R. W. 2001. Caulostrepsis spiralis isp. nov., Miocene grand bay formation of Carriacou (Grenadines, Lesser Antilles). Ichnos 8, 3-4, 261-264. DOI:10.1080/10420940109380194
Bertling, M., Insalaco, E. 1998. Late Jurassic coral/microbial reefs from the northern Paris Basin – facies, palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 139, 3-4, 139-75. DOI:10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00125-9
Feige, A., Fürsich, F. T. 1991. Taphonomy of the Recent molluscs of Bahia la Choya (Gulf of California, Sonora, Mexico). Zitteliana 18, 89-133.
Bromley, R. G., D’Alessandro, A. 1983. Bioerosion in the Pleistocene of southern Italy: ichnogenera Caulostrepsis and Maeandropolydora. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 89, 2, 283-309.
Hillmer, G., Schultz, M. G. 1973. Ableitung der Biologie und Ökologie eines Polychaeten der Oberkreide durch Analyse des Bohrganges Ramosulcichnus biforans (Gripp) nov. ichnogen [The biology and ecology of a polychaete of the upper Cretaceous through the analysis of core material of Ramosulcichnus biforans; new ichnogenus]. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 42, 5–24.
Voigt, E. 1971. Fremdskulpturen an Steinkernen von Polychaeten-Bohrgängen aus der Maastrichter Tuffkreide. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 45, 3, 144-153. DOI:10.1007/BF02989572